United States v. Courtney Taylor
United States v. Courtney Taylor
Opinion
USCA11 Case: 23-10458 Document: 27-1 Date Filed: 09/04/2024 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 23-10458 Non-Argument Calendar ____________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus COURTNEY TAYLOR,
Defendant-Appellant.
____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Georgia D.C. Docket No. 7:21-cr-00048-WLS-TQL-15 ____________________ USCA11 Case: 23-10458 Document: 27-1 Date Filed: 09/04/2024 Page: 2 of 2
2 Opinion of the Court 23-10458
Before JORDAN, BRASHER, and ABUDU, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: William E. Bubsey, appointed counsel for Courtney Taylor in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Taylor’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.