Ain Jeem, Inc. v. Carl Puckett, Jr.

USCA11 Case: 23-12267 Document: 26-1 Date Filed: 09/24/2024 Page: 1 of 3

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

In the

United States Court of Appeals

For the Eleventh Circuit

____________________

No. 23-12267 Non-Argument Calendar

____________________

AIN JEEM, INC.,

Plaintiff-Counter Defendant-Appellee, versus THE INDIVIDUALS, PARTNERSHIPS, AND UNINCORPORATED ASSOCIATIONS IDENTIFIED ON SCHEDULE A, et al.,

Defendants, HALL OF FAME SPORTS MEMORABILIA, INC., et al.,

USCA11 Case: 23-12267 Document: 26-1 Date Filed: 09/24/2024 Page: 2 of 3 2 Opinion of the Court 23-12267

Defendants-Counter Claimants, AKERMAN LLP ALEJANDRO J. FERNANDEZ, et al.,

Counter Defendants, CARL ELLEN PUCKETT, JR.,

Defendant-Counter Claimant Cross Claimant-Appellant,

MARCELLA ANDERSON PUCKETT,

Cross Claimant-Appellant. ____________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida D.C. Docket No. 8:21-cv-01331-VMC-AEP

____________________ Before JILL PRYOR, BRASHER, and ABUDU, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

USCA11 Case: 23-12267 Document: 26-1 Date Filed: 09/24/2024 Page: 3 of 3 23-12267 Opinion of the Court 3

Carl and Marcella Puckett, proceeding pro se, appeal from the district court’s June 23 and 28, 2023 orders denying their mo- tions for reconsideration. However, those orders were not final and appealable because claims asserted between the plaintiff and defendant Hall of Fame Sports Memorabilia, Inc. remained pend- ing at the time that the Pucketts appealed. See 28 U.S.C. § 1291; Supreme Fuels Trading FZE v. Sargeant, 689 F.3d 1244, 1245‑46 (11th Cir. 2012); Bogle v. Orange Cnty. Bd. of Cnty. Comm’rs, 162 F.3d 653, 661 (11th Cir. 1998) (providing that a notice of appeal is ineffective to appeal a future order or judgment that does not exist at the time the notice of appeal is filed); Robinson v. Tanner, 798 F.2d 1378, 1382-83 (11th Cir. 1986) (providing that an appeal from an interloc- utory order generally is not cured by the subsequent entry of final judgment).

Accordingly, this appeal is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdic- tion. All pending motions are DENIED as moot.