U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, 2024

Ain Jeem, Inc. v. Carl Puckett, Jr.

Ain Jeem, Inc. v. Carl Puckett, Jr.
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Decided September 24, 2024

Ain Jeem, Inc. v. Carl Puckett, Jr.

Opinion

USCA11 Case: 23-12267 Document: 26-1 Date Filed: 09/24/2024 Page: 1 of 3

[DO NOT PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 23-12267 Non-Argument Calendar ____________________ AIN JEEM, INC., Plaintiff-Counter Defendant-Appellee, versus THE INDIVIDUALS, PARTNERSHIPS, AND UNINCORPORATED ASSOCIATIONS IDENTIFIED ON SCHEDULE A, et al.,

Defendants,

HALL OF FAME SPORTS MEMORABILIA, INC., et al., USCA11 Case: 23-12267 Document: 26-1 Date Filed: 09/24/2024 Page: 2 of 3

2 Opinion of the Court 23-12267 Defendants-Counter Claimants,

AKERMAN LLP ALEJANDRO J. FERNANDEZ, et al.,

Counter Defendants,

CARL ELLEN PUCKETT, JR.,

Defendant-Counter Claimant Cross Claimant-Appellant,

MARCELLA ANDERSON PUCKETT,

Cross Claimant-Appellant.

____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida D.C. Docket No. 8:21-cv-01331-VMC-AEP ____________________ Before JILL PRYOR, BRASHER, and ABUDU, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: USCA11 Case: 23-12267 Document: 26-1 Date Filed: 09/24/2024 Page: 3 of 3

23-12267 Opinion of the Court 3 Carl and Marcella Puckett, proceeding pro se, appeal from the district court’s June 23 and 28, 2023 orders denying their mo- tions for reconsideration. However, those orders were not final and appealable because claims asserted between the plaintiff and defendant Hall of Fame Sports Memorabilia, Inc. remained pend- ing at the time that the Pucketts appealed. See 28 U.S.C. § 1291; Supreme Fuels Trading FZE v. Sargeant, 689 F.3d 1244, 1245‑46 (11th Cir. 2012); Bogle v. Orange Cnty. Bd. of Cnty. Comm’rs, 162 F.3d 653, (11th Cir. 1998) (providing that a notice of appeal is ineffective to appeal a future order or judgment that does not exist at the time the notice of appeal is filed); Robinson v. Tanner, 798 F.2d 1378, 1382-83 (11th Cir. 1986) (providing that an appeal from an interloc- utory order generally is not cured by the subsequent entry of final judgment).

Accordingly, this appeal is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdic- tion. All pending motions are DENIED as moot.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.