USCA11 Case: 23-10343   Document: 65-1     Date Filed: 10/03/2024   Page: 1 of 2




                                  In the
                United States Court of Appeals
                        For the Eleventh Circuit

                         ____________________

                               No. 23-10343
                         ____________________

       CLARISSA GILMORE,
                                                    Plaintiff-Appellant,
       versus
       GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS,
       an agency of the State of Georgia,
       COMMISSIONER,             GEORGIA          DEPARTMENT        OF
       CORRECTIONS,
       in his official capacity,
       ALBERTA W. MILTON,
       individually and in her official capacity,
       SABRINI CARLENE LUPO,
       individually and in her official capacity,
       SMITH SP WARDEN,
       in his official capacity as successor-in-interest,
       et al.,
USCA11 Case: 23-10343     Document: 65-1      Date Filed: 10/03/2024   Page: 2 of 2




       2                       Order of the Court                23-10343

                                                    Defendants-Appellees,


       DOUGLAS M. WILLIAMS,
       individually and in his official capacity,


                                                               Defendant.


                            ____________________

                  Appeal from the United States District Court
                     for the Southern District of Georgia
                   D.C. Docket No. 6:18-cv-00115-RSB-CLR
                           ____________________

       Before WILLIAM PRYOR, Chief Judge, WILSON, JORDAN,
       ROSENBAUM, JILL PRYOR, NEWSOM, BRANCH, GRANT, LUCK, LAGOA,
       BRASHER, and ABUDU, Circuit Judges.
       BY THE COURT:
              A petition for rehearing having been filed and a member of
       this Court in active service having requested a poll on whether this
       appeal should be reheard by the Court sitting en banc, and a ma-
       jority of the judges in active service on this Court having voted in
       favor of granting rehearing en banc, IT IS ORDERED that this ap-
       peal will be reheard en banc. The panel’s opinion is VACATED.
             .