U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, 2024

Clarissa Gilmore v. Georgia Department of Corrections

Clarissa Gilmore v. Georgia Department of Corrections
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Decided October 3, 2024
119 F.4th 839 (Federal Reporter, Fourth Series)
Clarissa Gilmore v. Georgia Department of Corrections

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

USCA11 Case: 23-10343 Document: 65-1 Date Filed: 10/03/2024 Page: 1 of 2

In the

United States Court of Appeals

For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________

No. 23-10343 ____________________

CLARISSA GILMORE,

Plaintiff-Appellant, versus

GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, an agency of the State of Georgia,

COMMISSIONER, GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, in his official capacity,

ALBERTA W. MILTON, individually and in her official capacity,

SABRINI CARLENE LUPO, individually and in her official capacity,

SMITH SP WARDEN, in his official capacity as successor-in-interest, et al., USCA11 Case: 23-10343 Document: 65-1 Date Filed: 10/03/2024 Page: 2 of 2

2 Order of the Court 23-10343 Defendants-Appellees,

DOUGLAS M. WILLIAMS, individually and in his official capacity,

Defendant.

____________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Georgia D.C. Docket No. 6:18-cv-00115-RSB-CLR ____________________

Before WILLIAM PRYOR, Chief Judge, WILSON, JORDAN, ROSENBAUM, JILL PRYOR, NEWSOM, BRANCH, GRANT, LUCK, LAGOA, BRASHER, and ABUDU, Circuit Judges.

BY THE COURT:

A petition for rehearing having been filed and a member of this Court in active service having requested a poll on whether this appeal should be reheard by the Court sitting en banc, and a ma- jority of the judges in active service on this Court having voted in favor of granting rehearing en banc, IT IS ORDERED that this ap- peal will be reheard en banc. The panel’s opinion is VACATED. .

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.