Carol Wilkerson v. Grinnell Corporation
Opinion
USCA11 Case: 24-12606 Document: 14-1 Date Filed: 10/24/2024 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
In the
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________
No. 24-12606
Non-Argument Calendar ____________________
CAROL WILKERSON,
Plaintiff-Appellant, versus GRINNELL CORPORATION,
Defendant-Appellee. ____________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Georgia D.C. Docket No. 6:99-cv-00133-RSB-CLR
____________________ USCA11 Case: 24-12606 Document: 14-1 Date Filed: 10/24/2024 Page: 2 of 2 2 Opinion of the Court 24-12606 Before WILSON, BRANCH, and LAGOA, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
This appeal is DISMISSED, sua sponte, for lack of jurisdic- tion. Carol Wilkerson appeals from the district court’s order deny- ing her motion to rescind its previous order imposing filing re- strictions on her.
We lack jurisdiction over this appeal because Wilkerson’s notice of appeal is untimely. See Green v. Drug Enf’t Admin., 606 F.3d 1296, 1300 (11th Cir. 2010). The deadline for filing a no- tice of appeal was July 8, 2024, and Wilkerson did not file her notice of appeal until August 9, 2024. See 28 U.S.C. § 2107(a); Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A). Moreover, there is no basis in the record for relief under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5) or 4(a)(6). See 28 U.S.C. § 2107(c); Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5)(A), 4(a)(6); Sanders v. United States, 113 F.3d 184, 187 (11th Cir. 1997).
No petition for rehearing may be filed unless it complies with the timing and other requirements of 11th Cir. R. 40-3 and all other applicable rules.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.