Peter Paul Mitrano v. Virginia L. Kelly
Opinion
USCA11 Case: 24-13410 Document: 9-1 Date Filed: 11/19/2024 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
In the
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eleventh Circuit
____________________
No. 24-13410 Non-Argument Calendar
____________________
In re: PETER PAUL MITRANO, ___________________________________________________ PETER PAUL MITRANO,
Plaintiff-Appellant, versus VIRGINIA L. KELLY,
Defendant-Appellee. ____________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida
USCA11 Case: 24-13410 Document: 9-1 Date Filed: 11/19/2024 Page: 2 of 2 2 Opinion of the Court 24-13410
D.C. Docket No. 6:24-cv-01694-JSS, 6:24-bk-02053-TPG ____________________
Before BRANCH, GRANT, and LAGOA, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
This appeal is DISMISSED, sua sponte, for lack of jurisdic- tion. Peter Paul Mitrano, proceeding pro se, appeals from the dis- trict court’s order denying his construed motion to withdraw the reference of his adversary proceeding against Virginia Kelly from the bankruptcy court. However, such orders are neither final, as they “essentially only determine the forum in which final decisions will be reached,” nor appealable as collateral orders, as they “re- main[] subject to review upon final judgment.” See Hialeah Hosp., Inc. v. Dep’t of Health & Rehabilitative Servs. (In re King Mem’l Hosp., Inc.), 767 F.2d 1508, 1510 (11th Cir. 1985).
No petition for rehearing may be filed unless it complies with the timing and other requirements of 11th Cir. R. 40-3 and all other applicable rules.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.