United States v. William Earl Jackson

USCA11 Case: 24-12452 Document: 23-1 Date Filed: 12/10/2024 Page: 1 of 2

[DO NOT PUBLISH] In the

United States Court of Appeals

For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________

No. 24-12452

Non-Argument Calendar ____________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee, versus

WILLIAM EARL JACKSON,

Defendant-Appellant.

____________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida D.C. Docket No. 8:24-cr-00135-VMC-TGW-1 ____________________ USCA11 Case: 24-12452 Document: 23-1 Date Filed: 12/10/2024 Page: 2 of 2

2 Opinion of the Court 24-12452

Before JORDAN, LUCK, and BRASHER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Meghan Ann Collins, counsel for William Earl Jackson in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s overall assessment of the rela- tive merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examina- tion of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, coun- sel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Jackson’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.