USCA11 Case: 23-13999 Document: 6-1 Date Filed: 01/09/2024 Page: 1 of 2

[DO NOT PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit

____________________

No. 23-13999 Non-Argument Calendar ____________________

ROTHSCHILD CONNECTED DEVICES INNOVATIONS, LLC, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus COCA-COLA COMPANY,

Defendant-Appellee.

____________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia D.C. Docket No. 1:16-cv-01241-TWT ____________________ USCA11 Case: 23-13999 Document: 6-1 Date Filed: 01/09/2024 Page: 2 of 2

2 Opinion of the Court 23-13999

Before ROSENBAUM, BRANCH, and LAGOA, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: This appeal is DISMISSED, sua sponte, for lack of jurisdic- tion. Rothschild Connected Devices Innovations, LLC (“RCDI”) appeals from the district court’s entry of summary judgment in fa- vor of Coca-Cola Company and the court’s order denying its mo- tion for reconsideration. RCDI’s amended complaint asserted a single claim for patent infringement arising under the patent laws of the United States, and its notice of appeal specified that it was appealing to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. The district court transmitted the notice of appeal to both courts of ap- peals. Because the Federal Circuit has exclusive jurisdiction over appeals from a final decision of a district court in any civil action arising under any Act of Congress relating to patents, we lack juris- diction to review the district court’s judgment and its order deny- ing reconsideration. See 28 U.S.C. § 1295(a)(1); Gunn v. Minton, 568 U.S. 251, 257 (2013); Holmes Grp., Inc. v. Vornado Air Circulations Sys., Inc., 535 U.S. 826, 830 (2002). No petition for rehearing may be filed unless it complies with the timing and other requirements of 11th Cir. R. 40-3 and all other applicable rules.