Amir Asherian v. Erica Ford
Amir Asherian v. Erica Ford
Opinion
USCA11 Case: 23-14000 Document: 7-1 Date Filed: 01/22/2024 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit
____________________
No. 23-14000 Non-Argument Calendar ____________________
AMIR ASHERIAN, HOOSHANG ASHERIAN, Plaintiffs-Appellees, versus ERICA FORD, ALL OTHER OCCUPANTS,
Defendants-Appellants.
____________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia USCA11 Case: 23-14000 Document: 7-1 Date Filed: 01/22/2024 Page: 2 of 2
2 Opinion of the Court 23-14000
D.C. Docket No. 1:23-cv-04460-JPB ____________________
Before JORDAN, JILL PRYOR, and GRANT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: This appeal is DISMISSED, sua sponte, for lack of jurisdic- tion. Erica Ford and all other occupants of a property owned by Amir and Hooshang Asherian appeal from the district court’s order remanding the case to state court. We lack jurisdiction to review the remand order because it was based on the district court’s lack of subject matter jurisdiction. See 28 U.S.C. § 1447(c)-(d); New v. Sports & Recreation, 114 F.3d 1092, 1095-96 (11th Cir. 1997); Whole Health Chiropractic & Wellness, Inc. v. Humana Med Plan, Inc., 254 F.3d 1317, 1319 (11th Cir. 2001). No petition for rehearing may be filed unless it complies with the timing and other requirements of 11th Cir. R. 40-3 and all other applicable rules.
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished