United States v. Akohomen Ighedoise
United States v. Akohomen Ighedoise
Opinion
USCA11 Case: 23-10270 Document: 32-1 Date Filed: 01/29/2024 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 23-10270 Non-Argument Calendar ____________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus AKOHOMEN IGHEDOISE,
Defendant-Appellant.
____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida D.C. Docket No. 8:15-cr-00320-SDM-MRM-1 ____________________ USCA11 Case: 23-10270 Document: 32-1 Date Filed: 01/29/2024 Page: 2 of 2
2 Opinion of the Court 23-10270
Before JORDAN, NEWSOM, and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: Thomas A. Burns, appointed counsel for Akohomen Ighedoise in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent review of the record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Ighedoise’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED. 1
1 Ighedoise’s motions for appointment of counsel and to proceed in forma pauperis are DENIED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.