United States v. Akohomen Ighedoise

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

United States v. Akohomen Ighedoise

Opinion

USCA11 Case: 23-10270 Document: 32-1 Date Filed: 01/29/2024 Page: 1 of 2

[DO NOT PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit

____________________

No. 23-10270 Non-Argument Calendar ____________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus AKOHOMEN IGHEDOISE,

Defendant-Appellant.

____________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida D.C. Docket No. 8:15-cr-00320-SDM-MRM-1 ____________________ USCA11 Case: 23-10270 Document: 32-1 Date Filed: 01/29/2024 Page: 2 of 2

2 Opinion of the Court 23-10270

Before JORDAN, NEWSOM, and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Thomas A. Burns, appointed counsel for Akohomen Ighedoise in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent review of the record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Ighedoise’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED. 1

1 Ighedoise’s motions for appointment of counsel and to proceed in forma

pauperis are DENIED.

Reference

Status
Unpublished