USCA11 Case: 23-14209 Document: 2-1 Date Filed: 01/30/2024 Page: 1 of 2

[DO NOT PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit

____________________

No. 23-14209 Non-Argument Calendar ____________________

WILLIAM A. ELLIS, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus TMX FINANCE LLC, TITTLE MAX,

Defendants- Appellees.

____________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia D.C. Docket No. 1:23-cv-03992-TCB USCA11 Case: 23-14209 Document: 2-1 Date Filed: 01/30/2024 Page: 2 of 2

2 Opinion of the Court 23-14209

____________________

Before JORDAN, JILL PRYOR, and NEWSOM, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: This appeal is DISMISSED, sua sponte, for lack of jurisdic- tion. The 30-day statutory time limit required William Ellis to file a notice of appeal from the district court’s order entered on Octo- ber 3, 2023 by November 2, 2023. See 28 U.S.C. § 2107(a); Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A). However, Ellis did not file his notice of appeal until December 18, 2023. Further, there is no basis in the record for relief under Fed- eral Rules of Appellate Procedure 4(a)(5) or 4(a)(6) because Ellis did not move to extend or reopen the appeal period or indicate in his notice of appeal that he failed to receive formal notice of the entry of the order. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5) (providing that a party may move to extend the time for filing a notice of appeal within 30 days of entry of final judgment); Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6)(A) (providing that the court may reopen the time to file an appeal for a period of 14 days where a party does not receive notice of the entry of the order). Accordingly, the notice of appeal is untimely and cannot invoke our appellate jurisdiction. See Hamer v. Neighborhood Hous. Servs. of Chi., 138 S. Ct. 13, 21 (2017). No petition for rehearing may be filed unless it complies with the timing and other requirements of 11th Cir. R. 40-3 and all other applicable rules.