United States v. Quinton Bannister

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

United States v. Quinton Bannister

Opinion

USCA11 Case: 23-11752 Document: 23-1 Date Filed: 02/05/2024 Page: 1 of 2

[DO NOT PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit

____________________

No. 23-11752 Non-Argument Calendar ____________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus QUINTON BANNISTER,

Defendant-Appellant.

____________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida D.C. Docket Nos. 9:05-cr-80063-DMM-1, 9:20-cv-81129-DMM-1 USCA11 Case: 23-11752 Document: 23-1 Date Filed: 02/05/2024 Page: 2 of 2

2 Opinion of the Court 23-11752

____________________

Before JORDAN, ROSENBAUM, and LAGOA, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Michael Cohen, appointed counsel for Quinton Bannister in appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is cor- rect. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Bannister’s sentences are AFFIRMED.

Reference

Status
Unpublished