United States v. Helio Rolando Lopez-Elizalde
United States v. Helio Rolando Lopez-Elizalde
Opinion
USCA11 Case: 23-10278 Document: 20-1 Date Filed: 02/22/2024 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit
____________________
No. 23-10278 Non-Argument Calendar ____________________
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus HELIO ROLANDO LOPEZ-ELIZALDE,
Defendant-Appellant.
____________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida D.C. Docket No. 1:22-cr-00012-AW-GRJ-1 ____________________ USCA11 Case: 23-10278 Document: 20-1 Date Filed: 02/22/2024 Page: 2 of 2
2 Opinion of the Court 23-10278
Before WILSON, JORDAN, and LAGOA, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Richard Summa, counsel for Helio Lopez-Elizalde in this di- rect criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further repre- sentation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. Cal- ifornia, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Lopez-Elizalde’s convictions and to- tal sentence are AFFIRMED.
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished