USCA11 Case: 23-14178 Document: 18-1 Date Filed: 03/12/2024 Page: 1 of 3

[DO NOT PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit

____________________

No. 23-14178 Non-Argument Calendar ____________________

MARK T. STINSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus JOHN P. YATES, Warden, BLAIR, Camp Unit Manager, RANDLE, Lt., RENDON, Camp Counsel, CRAWFORD, USCA11 Case: 23-14178 Document: 18-1 Date Filed: 03/12/2024 Page: 2 of 3

2 Opinion of the Court 23-14178

Officer,

Defendants-Appellees.

____________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida D.C. Docket No. 1:23-cv-24750-RAR ____________________

Before NEWSOM, LAGOA, and ABUDU, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Mark Stinson appeals from the district court’s order trans- ferring his case to the Eastern District of Arkansas, but that order is not appealable. See 28 U.S.C. § 1406(a) (providing that a district court may transfer a case if venue is lacking in the district court in which the case was filed); Stelly v. Emps. Nat’l Ins. Co., 431 F.2d 1251, 1253 (5th Cir. 1970) (holding that an order transferring a case under 28 U.S.C. § 1406(a) is interlocutory and non-appealable); Middle- brooks v. Smith, 735 F.2d 431, 433 (11th Cir. 1984) (explaining that a transfer order is not immediately appealable under the collateral order doctrine). Accordingly, this appeal is DISMISSED, sua sponte, for lack of jurisdiction. All pending motions are DENIED as moot. No pe- tition for rehearing may be filed unless it complies with the timing USCA11 Case: 23-14178 Document: 18-1 Date Filed: 03/12/2024 Page: 3 of 3

23-14178 Opinion of the Court 3

and other requirements of 11th Cir. R. 40-3 and all other applicable rules.