United States v. Richard Palacios

USCA11 Case: 22-12722 Document: 44-1 Date Filed: 03/26/2024 Page: 1 of 2

[DO NOT PUBLISH] In the

United States Court of Appeals

For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________

No. 22-12722

Non-Argument Calendar ____________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee, versus

RICHARD PALACIOS, a.k.a. Cachinge,

Defendant-Appellant.

____________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida D.C. Docket No. 8:18-cr-00509-CEH-TGW-3 USCA11 Case: 22-12722 Document: 44-1 Date Filed: 03/26/2024 Page: 2 of 2

2 Opinion of the Court 22-12722 ____________________

Before WILLIAM PRYOR, Chief Judge, NEWSOM, and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Darlene Calzon Barror, appointed counsel for Richard Pala- cios in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s mo- tion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Palacios’s conviction and sen- tence are AFFIRMED.