USCA11 Case: 23-11130 Document: 64-1 Date Filed: 04/19/2024 Page: 1 of 3

[DO NOT PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit

____________________

No. 23-11130 ____________________

DORIS HADCOCK Plaintiff, SHELLEY CARRIER, personal representative of the estate of Doris Hadcock, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus JEST OPERATING, INC., d.b.a. Somerset, PATRICIA R. LEININGER, MERIDETH C. NAGEL, MERIDETH NAGEL, P.A., ELIZABETH HEIMAN, USCA11 Case: 23-11130 Document: 64-1 Date Filed: 04/19/2024 Page: 2 of 3

2 Opinion of the Court 23-11130

Defendants-Appellees,

MICHAEL J. ROGERS, et al.,

Defendants.

____________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida D.C. Docket No. 5:20-cv-00095-JSM-PRL ____________________

Before WILSON, LUCK, and LAGOA, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: We have considered all arguments raised on appeal by Plain- tiff-Appellant Shelley Carrier, including that:

I. The district court abused its discretion in excluding the testimony and report of Kathryn Strodel. II. The district court abused its discretion in excluding evidence and testimony relating to Neal Hadcock’s probate. III. The district court abused its discretion in excluding evidence of Neal Hadcock’s residency at Somerset Assisted Living Facility. USCA11 Case: 23-11130 Document: 64-1 Date Filed: 04/19/2024 Page: 3 of 3

23-11130 Opinion of the Court 3

IV. The district court erred in granting Defendants’ mo- tions for directed verdicts. After careful review and consideration of the briefs and the record, and having the benefit of oral argument, we find no reversi- ble error in the proceedings in the district court. Therefore, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.