United States v. Matthias Jacob Edward Mann

USCA11 Case: 23-10277 Document: 34-1 Date Filed: 04/26/2024 Page: 1 of 2

[DO NOT PUBLISH] In the

United States Court of Appeals

For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________

No. 23-10277

Non-Argument Calendar ____________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee, versus

MATTHIAS JACOB EDWARD MANN,

Defendant-Appellant.

____________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama D.C. Docket No. 5:22-cr-00010-LCB-HNJ-1 ____________________ USCA11 Case: 23-10277 Document: 34-1 Date Filed: 04/26/2024 Page: 2 of 2

2 Opinion of the Court 23-10277

Before JORDAN, NEWSOM, and LAGOA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

William Bradford, appointed counsel for Matthias Mann in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Mann has filed a pro se response in which he re- quests the appointment of new counsel. Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, Mann’s motion for the appointment of new counsel is DENIED, and Mann’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.