United States v. Devon Urbigkeit
United States v. Devon Urbigkeit
Opinion
USCA11 Case: 22-14044 Document: 75-1 Date Filed: 05/16/2024 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 22-14044 Non-Argument Calendar ____________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus DEVON GILBERT URBIGKEIT, a.k.a. Devon Yates
Defendant-Appellant.
____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida D.C. Docket No. 8:21-cr-00059-SCB-JSS-1 USCA11 Case: 22-14044 Document: 75-1 Date Filed: 05/16/2024 Page: 2 of 2
2 Opinion of the Court 22-14044 ____________________ Before NEWSOM, BRASHER, and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: Devon Urbigkeit pleaded guilty to passport forgery and counterfeiting. The district court sentenced him to serve 18 months in prison and 3 years of supervised release. As to the latter, the court imposed 13 discretionary conditions of supervised re- lease. The court did not announce those 13 conditions at the sen- tencing hearing but included them for the first time in Urbigkeit’s written judgment.
Urbigkeit challenges those 13 conditions, claiming that the court erred by imposing those conditions without announcing them at the sentencing hearing. The United States concedes that the district court committed an error. We agree. See United States v. Rodriguez, 75 F.4th 1231, 1246 n.5 (11th Cir. 2023). Accordingly, we must vacate those 13 conditions and remand this case for resentenc- ing.
The government also asks to withdraw a previously filed motion to dismiss this appeal.
We GRANT the Motion to Withdraw and DENY AS MOOT the “Motion to Dismiss Appeal Based on Waiver in Plea Agreement.” We VACATE Urgibkeit’s sentence of supervised re- lease and remand for further proceedings consistent with this opin- ion.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.