USCA11 Case: 24-11021 Document: 20-1 Date Filed: 07/01/2024 Page: 1 of 2

[DO NOT PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 24-11021 Non-Argument Calendar ____________________ JUAN JOSE RENDON DELGADO, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus BLOOMBERG L.P., JORDAN ROBERTSON, MICHAEL RILEY,

Defendants-Appellants,

____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida USCA11 Case: 24-11021 Document: 20-1 Date Filed: 07/01/2024 Page: 2 of 2

2 Opinion of the Court 24-11021 D.C. Docket No. 1:17-cv-21192-KMW ____________________ Before BRANCH, GRANT, and JULIE CARNES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: We may use our inherent administrative power to dismiss duplicative litigation to avoid wasting judicial resources. See I.A.

Durbin, Inc. v. Jefferson Nat’l Bank, 793 F.2d 1541, 1551 (11th Cir. 1986); United States v. Arlt, 567 F.2d 1295, 1297 (5th Cir. 1978); Sinochem Int’l Co. v. Malay. Int’l Shipping Corp., 549 U.S. 422, 431 (2007). In a separate appeal, no. 19-4046, this Court entered a limited remand to the district court for the purpose of determining whether it had subject-matter jurisdiction over the case in the first instance. The district court entered an order finding that it did have jurisdiction, from which the defendants now appeal. This appeal is unnecessary because the jurisdictional issue that the district court addressed on remand is already presented in appeal no. 19-14046.

Dismissal of this appeal does not preclude the Court from considering the parties’ arguments on that issue in appeal no. 19- 14046.

Accordingly, this appeal is DISMISSED as duplicative. All pending motions are DENIED as moot.