Paul Walde v. Sharon Keri
Opinion
USCA11 Case: 24-11631 Document: 10-1 Date Filed: 07/03/2024 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH] In the
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________
No. 24-11631
Non-Argument Calendar ____________________
PAUL WALDE,
Plaintiff-Appellant, versus
SHARON KERI,
Process Manager,
JOHN DOE,
Unnamed defendant person of
DMV over see license suspension,
PERSON OF DMV DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR
VEHICLES,
Defendants-Appellees.
USCA11 Case: 24-11631 Document: 10-1 Date Filed: 07/03/2024 Page: 2 of 2
2 Opinion of the Court 24-11631 ____________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida D.C. Docket No. 4:23-cv-00412-RH-MAF ____________________
Before ROSENBAUM, GRANT, and LUCK, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
This appeal is DISMISSED, sua sponte, for lack of jurisdic- tion. Paul Walde, proceeding pro se, appeals the district court’s February 26, 2024 final order and judgment. The statutory time limit required him to file a notice of appeal on or before April 11, 2024, 30 days after the district court’s March 12, 2024 order denying his timely motion to reconsider the final order. See 28 U.S.C. § 2107(a); Fed. R. App. P. 4(a); Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e). However, he did not file his instant notice of appeal until May 20, 2024, and thus, it cannot invoke our jurisdiction. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(c)(1); Hamer v. Neighborhood Hous. Servs. of Chi., 138 S. Ct. 13, 21 (2017). No petition for rehearing may be filed unless it complies with the timing and other requirements of 11th Cir. R. 40-3 and all other applicable rules.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.