United States v. Rodney Jackson
Opinion
USCA11 Case: 24-10315 Document: 18-1 Date Filed: 07/10/2024 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH] In the
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________
No. 24-10315
Non-Argument Calendar ____________________
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee, versus
RODNEY TERRELL JACKSON,
Defendant- Appellant.
____________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida D.C. Docket No. 1:10-cr-00020-AW-GRJ-1 ____________________ USCA11 Case: 24-10315 Document: 18-1 Date Filed: 07/10/2024 Page: 2 of 2
2 Opinion of the Court 24-10315
Before JILL PRYOR, BRANCH, and GRANT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Megan Saillant, appointed counsel for Rodney Jackson in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent review of the record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Jackson’s revocation of supervised release and sentence are AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.