U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, 2025

Carl Hill v. S. Manning

Carl Hill v. S. Manning
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Decided January 2, 2025

Carl Hill v. S. Manning

Opinion

USCA11 Case: 24-13698 Document: 9-1 Date Filed: 01/02/2025 Page: 1 of 3

[DO NOT PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 24-13698 Non-Argument Calendar ____________________ CARL M. HILL, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus S. ALEXANDRA MANNING, County Magistrate; Individual and Official Capacity, SCOTT M. KAYE, Judicial Officer; Individual and Official Capacity, MEGAN MILLER, Guardian Ad Litem/ Mediator; Individual and Official Capacity, CRAIG L. SCHWALL, Superior Court Judge; Official Capacity, USCA11 Case: 24-13698 Document: 9-1 Date Filed: 01/02/2025 Page: 2 of 3

2 Opinion of the Court 24-13698 Defendants-Appellees.

____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia D.C. Docket No. 1:21-cv-04549-SDG ____________________ Before WILSON, JILL PRYOR, and BRANCH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: This appeal is DISMISSED, sua sponte, for lack of jurisdic- tion. Carl Hill seeks to appeal from the district court’s September 30, 2024 order denying his motion for reconsideration under Fed- eral Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b) and denying him relief under Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 4(a)(6). The 30-day statutory time limit required Hill to file a notice of appeal from that order on or before October 30, 2024. See 28 U.S.C. § 2107(a); Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A). However, Hill did not file his notice of appeal until No- vember 4, 2024.

Lastly, the record contains no basis for relief under Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure 4(a)(5) or 4(a)(6). See Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5) (providing that a party may move to extend the time for filing a notice of appeal within 30 days of entry of the order or judg- ment); id. R. 4(a)(6)(A) (providing that the court may reopen the time to file an appeal for a period of 14 days where a party does not receive timely notice of the entry of the order or judgment).

USCA11 Case: 24-13698 Document: 9-1 Date Filed: 01/02/2025 Page: 3 of 3

24-13698 Opinion of the Court 3 Accordingly, the notice of appeal is untimely and cannot invoke our appellate jurisdiction. See Green v. Drug Enf’t Admin., 606 F.3d 1296, 1300 (11th Cir. 2010).

No petition for rehearing may be filed unless it complies with the timing and other requirements of 11th Cir. R. 40-3 and all other applicable rules.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.