USCA11 Case: 23-11716 Document: 39-1 Date Filed: 01/07/2025 Page: 1 of 2

[DO NOT PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 23-11716 Non-Argument Calendar ____________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JASON ALAN SCRUGGS,

Defendant-Appellant.

____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida D.C. Docket No. 6:21-cr-00119-WWB-DCI-1 ____________________ USCA11 Case: 23-11716 Document: 39-1 Date Filed: 01/07/2025 Page: 2 of 2

2 Opinion of the Court 23-11716

Before JILL PRYOR, BRANCH, and BLACK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: The Government’s motion to dismiss this appeal pursuant to the appeal waiver in Appellant’s plea agreement is GRANTED.

See United States v. Bushert, 997 F.2d 1343, 1345, 1350–51 (11th Cir. 1993) (holding we will enforce sentence appeal waivers if they are made “knowingly and voluntarily”); United States v. Boyd, 975 F.3d 1185, 1192 (11th Cir. 2020) (noting the “touchstone” for assessing if a sentence appeal waiver was made knowingly and vol- untarily is whether it was clearly conveyed to the defendant that he was giving up his right to appeal under most circumstances, even if the court did not expressly address every exception to the appeal waiver); United States v. Howle, 166 F.3d 1166, 1169 (11th Cir. 1999) (explaining an appeal waiver may include a waiver to appeal difficult legal issues, debatable legal issues, or even blatant error); United States v. Bascomb, 451 F.3d 1292, 1296-97 (11th Cir. 2006) (stating a “vigorous” dispute during sentencing does not preserve that issue for appeal when it does not fall under an exception to the appeal waiver).