United States v. Sam Harris, Jr.
Opinion
USCA11 Case: 24-10873 Document: 30-1 Date Filed: 01/15/2025 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH] In the
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________
No. 24-10873
Non-Argument Calendar ____________________
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee, versus
SAM DAVID HARRIS, JR.,
Defendant-Appellant.
____________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida D.C. Docket No. 3:23-cr-00073-TJC-MCR-1 ____________________ USCA11 Case: 24-10873 Document: 30-1 Date Filed: 01/15/2025 Page: 2 of 2
2 Opinion of the Court 24-10873
Before JORDAN, JILL PRYOR, and BRASHER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Valarie Linnen, appointed counsel for Sam David Harris, Jr., in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent review of the record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Harris’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.