Kathleen Edwards v. Darden Group, Inc.

USCA11 Case: 24-13913 Document: 37-1 Date Filed: 01/30/2025 Page: 1 of 2

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

In the

United States Court of Appeals

For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________

No. 24-13913

Non-Argument Calendar ____________________

KATHLEEN EDWARDS, SEAN LANGSHAW,

Plaintiffs-Appellants, versus DARDEN GROUP, INC., DARDEN RESTAURANTS, INC., DARDEN CORPORATION, GMRI, INC.,

Defendants-Appellees. USCA11 Case: 24-13913 Document: 37-1 Date Filed: 01/30/2025 Page: 2 of 2 2 Opinion of the Court 24-13913

____________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida D.C. Docket No. 0:24-cv-61818-MD ____________________

Before JILL PRYOR, GRANT, and KIDD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

This appeal is DISMISSED, sua sponte, for lack of jurisdic- tion. Kathleen Edwards and Sean Langshaw appeal from the mag- istrate judge’s (1) November 7, 2024, order denying their motions for sanctions and to remand, as well as their first motion for sum- mary judgment, and (2) November 22, 2024, order denying their motion for reconsideration and amended motion for summary judgment. We lack jurisdiction to review either of those orders because they were issued by a magistrate judge, the district court has not rendered them final, and there is no indication in the record that the parties consented to the magistrate judge conducting the proceeding. See 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (providing that the courts of ap- peals have jurisdiction over “appeals from all final decisions of the district courts”); United States v. Schultz, 565 F.3d 1353, 1359 (11th Cir. 2009); 28 U.S.C. § 636(c).

All pending motions are DENIED as moot. No petition for rehearing may be filed unless it complies with the timing and other requirements of 11th Cir. R. 40-3 and all other applicable rules.