William Apgar, Jr. v. United States
Opinion
USCA11 Case: 24-12725 Document: 25-1 Date Filed: 03/19/2025 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH] In the
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________
No. 24-12725
Non-Argument Calendar ____________________
WILLIAM L. APGAR, JR.,
Plaintiff-Appellant, versus
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Defendant- Appellee.
____________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida D.C. Docket No. 5:21-mc-00017-JA-PRL ____________________ USCA11 Case: 24-12725 Document: 25-1 Date Filed: 03/19/2025 Page: 2 of 2
2 Opinion of the Court 24-12725
Before ROSENBAUM, ABUDU, and WILSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Matthew Cavender, appointed counsel for William Apgar in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Apgar’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED. Apgar’s motion for appointment of new counsel is DENIED as moot.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.