United States v. Jennifer Scoggins
United States v. Jennifer Scoggins
Opinion
USCA11 Case: 24-11544 Document: 34-1 Date Filed: 03/27/2025 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 24-11544 Non-Argument Calendar ____________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JENNIFER CORINNE SCOGGINS,
Defendant-Appellant.
____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama D.C. Docket No. 5:23-cr-00087-MHH-HNJ-1 ____________________ USCA11 Case: 24-11544 Document: 34-1 Date Filed: 03/27/2025 Page: 2 of 2
2 Opinion of the Court 24-11544
Before JORDAN, LUCK, and KIDD, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: William Bradford, appointed counsel for Jennifer Scoggins in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record re- veals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record re- veals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Scoggins’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.