SFR JV-2 Property LLC v. Shawn Thomas
Opinion
USCA11 Case: 25-10364 Document: 10-1 Date Filed: 03/28/2025 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
In the
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eleventh Circuit
____________________
No. 25-10364 Non-Argument Calendar
____________________
SFR JV-2 PROPERTY LLC,
Plaintiff-Appellee, versus SHAWN THOMAS, And all other occupants,
Defendant-Appellant. ____________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia
D.C. Docket No. 1:25-cv-00224-MHC
____________________ USCA11 Case: 25-10364 Document: 10-1 Date Filed: 03/28/2025 Page: 2 of 2 2 Opinion of the Court 25-10364 Before GRANT, BRASHER, and ABUDU, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Shawn Thomas, proceeding pro se, appeals the district court’s order remanding his case to state court for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. However, that order is unreviewable on ap- peal. See 28 U.S.C. § 1447(c), (d); New v. Sports & Recreation, 114 F.3d 1092, 1096 (11th Cir. 1997) (“Cases remanded for lack of juris- diction are immune from review even if the district court’s decision is clearly erroneous.”). Additionally, Thomas did not invoke 28 U.S.C. §§ 1442 or 1443 as the basis for the removal. See 28 U.S.C. § 1447(d); see BP P.L.C. v. Mayor of Balt., 593 U.S. 230, 238-39 (2021) (concluding that, because the defendants cited § 1442 in their no- tice of removal, the whole of the district court’s remand order was reviewable on appeal).
Accordingly, this appeal is DISMISSED, sua sponte, for lack of jurisdiction. No petition for rehearing may be filed unless it complies with the timing and other requirements of 11th Cir. R. 40-3 and all other applicable rules.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.