USCA11 Case: 25-10626 Document: 5-1 Date Filed: 03/28/2025 Page: 1 of 2

[DO NOT PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 25-10626 Non-Argument Calendar ____________________ PROPERTY SOURCE RENTALS LLC, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ELIZABETH KERSHAW,

Defendant-Appellant.

____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia D.C. Docket No. 1:25-cv-00228-ELR ____________________ USCA11 Case: 25-10626 Document: 5-1 Date Filed: 03/28/2025 Page: 2 of 2

2 Opinion of the Court 25-10626

Before NEWSOM, BRASHER, and ABUDU, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: Elizabeth Kershaw, proceeding pro se, appeals the district court’s order remanding her case to state court for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. However, that order is unreviewable on ap- peal. See 28 U.S.C. § 1447(c), (d); New v. Sports & Recreation, 114 F.3d 1092, 1096 (11th Cir. 1997) (“Cases remanded for lack of juris- diction are immune from review even if the district court’s decision is clearly erroneous.”). Additionally, Kershaw did not invoke 28 U.S.C. §§ 1442 or 1443 as the basis for the removal. See 28 U.S.C. § 1447(d); see BP P.L.C. v. Mayor of Balt., 593 U.S. 230, 238-39 (2021) (concluding that, because the defendants cited § 1442 in their no- tice of removal, the whole of the district court’s remand order was reviewable on appeal).

Accordingly, this appeal is DISMISSED, sua sponte, for lack of jurisdiction. No petition for rehearing may be filed unless it complies with the timing and other requirements of 11th Cir. R. 40-3 and all other applicable rules.