USCA11 Case: 25-10999 Document: 23-2 Date Filed: 05/02/2025 Page: 1 of 2

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 25-10999 ____________________ ROBERT WALKER, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, VICTORIA RUIZ, ALBERTELLI LAW, U.S. BANK HOME MORTGAGE, d.b.a. U.S. Bank National Association, U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, et al.,

Defendants-Appellees.

____________________ USCA11 Case: 25-10999 Document: 23-2 Date Filed: 05/02/2025 Page: 2 of 2

2 Order of the Court 25-10999 Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida D.C. Docket No. 2:24-cv-14222-KMM ____________________ Before JILL PRYOR, GRANT, and BRASHER, Circuit Judges.

BY THE COURT: The Court’s April 30, 2025 order is VACATED and replaced with this order.

Robert Walker, pro se, appeals from the district court’s Feb- ruary 12 and 14, 2025, orders dismissing his amended complaint; its February 28, 2025, order addressing his post-dismissal motion for clarification; and several of its pre-dismissal orders. He also appeals this Court’s order clerically dismissing two of his previous appeals from the same case.

This appeal is DISMISSED IN PART, sua sponte, for lack of jurisdiction to the extent Walker appeals from our clerical dismissal order. That order was not issued by the district court and thus is not reviewable in an independent appeal. See 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (providing that we have jurisdiction over “appeals from all final de- cisions of the district courts”); id. § 1292 (providing that we also have jurisdiction over certain interlocutory district court orders).

Walker’s appeal from the district court’s orders may pro- ceed. No motion for reconsideration may be filed unless it com- plies with the timing and other requirements of 11th Cir. R. 27-2 and all other applicable rules.