Gloria Ann Haigler v. Edward Felipe Gonzalez

USCA11 Case: 25-10636 Document: 15-1 Date Filed: 05/09/2025 Page: 1 of 2

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

In the

United States Court of Appeals

For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________

No. 25-10636

Non-Argument Calendar ____________________

GLORIA ANN HAIGLER,

Plaintiff-Appellee, versus EDWARD FELIPE GONZALEZ,

Defendant-Appellant. ____________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida

D.C. Docket No. 0:24-cv-61831-RS

____________________ USCA11 Case: 25-10636 Document: 15-1 Date Filed: 05/09/2025 Page: 2 of 2 2 Opinion of the Court 25-10636 Before JILL PRYOR, BRANCH, and KIDD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Edward Gonzalez, proceeding pro se, appeals from the dis- trict court’s order remanding a foreclosure action to state court. Gloria Haigler filed a motion to dismiss this appeal for lack of juris- diction.

We lack jurisdiction to review the district court’s order be- cause it remanded the case for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. See 28 U.S.C. § 1447(c), (d); New v. Sports & Recreation, 114 F.3d 1092, 1096 (11th Cir. 1997) (“Cases remanded for lack of jurisdic- tion are immune from review even if the district court’s decision is clearly erroneous.”). Further, in his notice of removal, Gonzalez did not invoke 28 U.S.C. §§ 1442 or 1443, by citation or otherwise. See 28 U.S.C. § 1447(d); BP P.L.C. v. Mayor of Balt., 593 U.S. 230, 238-39 (2021) (concluding that, because the defendants cited § 1442 in their notice of removal, the whole of the district court’s remand order was reviewable on appeal).

Accordingly, Haigler’s motion is GRANTED, and this ap- peal is DISMISSED. All other pending motions are DENIED as moot.