USCA11 Case: 25-11747 Document: 8-1 Date Filed: 06/25/2025 Page: 1 of 2

[DO NOT PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 25-11747 Non-Argument Calendar ____________________ ROGER SHEKAR, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus PHH MORTGAGE CORPORATION, d.b.a. Onity Group, Inc, ONITY GROUP INC., GLEN MESSINA, as an Individual, SELENE HOLDINGS, LLC, d.b.a. Selene Finance, L.P., PRETIUM PARTNERS, LLC, et al., USCA11 Case: 25-11747 Document: 8-1 Date Filed: 06/25/2025 Page: 2 of 2

2 Opinion of the Court 25-11747 Defendants-Appellees.

____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida D.C. Docket No. 8:25-cv-01227-KKM-CPT ____________________ Before NEWSOM, GRANT, and LUCK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: This appeal is DISMISSED, sua sponte, for lack of jurisdiction because it is not taken from a final or immediately appealable or- der.

Roger Shekar, pro se, appeals from the district court’s May 21, 2025, order denying his motion to reconsider the denial of his motions to file documents through the court’s CM/ECF system.

Because the order did not dispose of any, much less all, of Shekar’s claims, it is not final. See 28 U.S.C. § 1291; CSX Transp., Inc. v. City of Garden City, 235 F.3d 1325, 1327 (11th Cir. 2000). Nor is it imme- diately appealable under the collateral-order doctrine, as it is effec- tively reviewable on appeal from a final judgment. See Acheron Cap., Ltd. v. Mukamal, 22 F.4th 979, 989 (11th Cir. 2022). Finally, the district court declined to certify the order for immediate appeal under 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b).