Felissa Grissett v. Department of Veterans Affairs

USCA11 Case: 25-12196 Document: 14-1 Date Filed: 08/13/2025 Page: 1 of 3

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

In the

United States Court of Appeals

For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________

No. 25-12196

Non-Argument Calendar ____________________

FELISSA GRISSETT,

Plaintiff-Appellant, versus DEPARTMENT OF VETERAN'S AFFAIRS,

Defendant-Appellee. ____________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia D.C. Docket No. 1:25-cv-03386-MHC

____________________ USCA11 Case: 25-12196 Document: 14-1 Date Filed: 08/13/2025 Page: 2 of 3 2 Opinion of the Court 25-12196 Before BRANCH, GRANT, and LAGOA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Felissa Grissett, pro se, filed a notice of appeal complaining of “ongoing harassment,” but it is unclear what order she seeks to challenge on appeal. The only order the district court has entered is an order granting Grissett leave to proceed in forma pauperis.

We lack jurisdiction over this appeal because the district court has not entered any final and appealable order. See 28 U.S.C. § 1291; Acheron Cap., Ltd. v. Mukamal, 22 F.4th 979, 986 (11th Cir. 2022) (stating that an appealable final order ends the liti- gation on the merits and leaves nothing for the court to do but ex- ecute its judgment). The district court has not issued any final de- cision on the merits, and Grissett’s civil complaint remains pend- ing. See Supreme Fuels Trading FZE v. Sargeant, 689 F.3d 1244, 1246 (11th Cir. 2012) (noting that an order that disposes of fewer than all claims against all parties to an action is not immediately appealable absent certification pursuant to Rule 54(b)). Nor has the district court entered any order that would be effectively unreviewable on appeal from a final order resolving the case on the merits. See Plain- tiff A v. Schair, 744 F.3d 1247, 1252-53 (11th Cir. 2014) (explaining that a ruling that does not conclude the litigation may be appealed under the collateral order doctrine if it, inter alia, is “effectively un- reviewable on appeal from a final judgment”).

Accordingly, this appeal is DISMISSED, sua sponte, for lack of jurisdiction. All pending motions are DENIED as moot.