United States v. Avinash Singh
Opinion
USCA11 Case: 24-12633 Document: 25-1 Date Filed: 10/07/2025 Page: 1 of 2
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
In the
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________
No. 24-12633
Non-Argument Calendar ____________________
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee, versus
AVINASH SINGH,
Defendant-Appellant. ____________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida D.C. Docket No. 6:20-cr-00165-CEM-RMN-1 ____________________
Before LAGOA, ABUDU, and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Ryan Truskoski, appointed counsel for Avinash Singh in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further repre- sentation of the Appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. USCA11 Case: 24-12633 Document: 25-1 Date Filed: 10/07/2025 Page: 2 of 2
2 Opinion of the Court 24-12633 California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent review of the en- tire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the en- tire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Singh’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.