United States v. David Riddle, Jr.
Opinion
USCA11 Case: 24-13083 Document: 32-1 Date Filed: 11/14/2025 Page: 1 of 2
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
In the
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________
No. 24-13083
Non-Argument Calendar ____________________
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee, versus
DAVID WAYNE RIDDLE, JR.,
Defendant-Appellant. ____________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida D.C. Docket No. 3:23-cr-00032-MMH-MCR-1 ____________________
Before JORDAN, ABUDU, and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Caleb Rowland, appointed counsel for David Riddle, Jr. in this appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 USCA11 Case: 24-13083 Document: 32-1 Date Filed: 11/14/2025 Page: 2 of 2
2 Opinion of the Court 24-13083 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record re- veals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record re- veals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Riddle’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.