USCA11 Case: 25-13303 Document: 13-1 Date Filed: 12/10/2025 Page: 1 of 2

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 25-13303 Non-Argument Calendar ____________________

JOSE YEYILLE, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus

GREENBERG TRAURIG, P.A., in its individual capacity and in its official capacity, jointly and severally liable, JOHN K. LONDOT, ESQ., in his individual capacity and in his official capacity, jointly and severally liable, Defendants-Appellees. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida D.C. Docket No. 1:25-cv-21891-DPG ____________________

Before GRANT, ABUDU, and KIDD, Circuit Judges. USCA11 Case: 25-13303 Document: 13-1 Date Filed: 12/10/2025 Page: 2 of 2

2 Opinion of the Court 25-13303

PER CURIAM: Jose Yeyille, pro se, filed a notice of appeal designating the district court’s September 17, 2025 order deferring ruling on Yey- ille’s postjudgment motion for disqualification and relief from dis- missal. We lack jurisdiction over the September 17 order because it did not dispose of any, much less all, of the issues raised in Yeyille’s postjudgment motion and, therefore, is not a final order. See 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (providing that we have jurisdiction over “appeals from all final decisions of the district courts”); Mayer v. Wall St. Eq- uity Grp., Inc., 672 F.3d 1222, 1224 (11th Cir. 2012) (explaining that in postjudgment proceedings, “an order is deemed final if it dis- poses of all the issues raised in the motion that initially sparked the postjudgment proceedings”). The order is not appealable under the collateral order doc- trine because it did not resolve any of the issues raised in Yeyille’s motion and may be reviewed on appeal from a final order in the postjudgment proceedings. See Plaintiff A v. Schair, 744 F.3d 1247, 1252-53 (11th Cir. 2014) (explaining that a ruling that does not con- clude the litigation may be appealed under the collateral order doc- trine if it conclusively resolves an important issue collateral to the merits and is effectively unreviewable on appeal from a final judg- ment). Accordingly, this appeal is DISMISSED, sua sponte, for lack of jurisdiction. All pending motions are DENIED as moot.