United States v. Maurice Ridley

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

United States v. Maurice Ridley

Opinion

USCA11 Case: 24-12898 Document: 34-1 Date Filed: 12/15/2025 Page: 1 of 2

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 24-12898 Non-Argument Calendar ____________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus

MAURICE RIDLEY, Defendant-Appellant. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Georgia D.C. Docket No. 7:20-cr-00029-WLS-TQL-1 ____________________

Before JORDAN, JILL PRYOR, and KIDD, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Richard Adam Greenberg, appointed counsel for Maurice Ridley in this appeal, has moved to withdraw from further repre- sentation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. USCA11 Case: 24-12898 Document: 34-1 Date Filed: 12/15/2025 Page: 2 of 2

2 Opinion of the Court 24-12898

California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent review of the en- tire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the en- tire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Ridley’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.

Reference

Status
Unpublished