United States v. Durrell Marquis Lee

USCA11 Case: 24-13667 Document: 25-1 Date Filed: 12/15/2025 Page: 1 of 2

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

In the

United States Court of Appeals

For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________

No. 24-13667

Non-Argument Calendar ____________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee, versus

DURRELL MARQUIS LEE, a.k.a. ID,

Defendant-Appellant. ____________________

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida D.C. Docket No. 4:23-cr-00035-MW-MAF-1 ____________________ ____________________

No. 24-13716

Non-Argument Calendar ____________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, USCA11 Case: 24-13667 Document: 25-1 Date Filed: 12/15/2025 Page: 2 of 2

2 Opinion of the Court 24-13667 Plaintiff-Appellee, versus

DURRELL LEE,

Defendant-Appellant. ____________________

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida D.C. Docket No. 4:15-cr-00038-MW-MAF-1 ____________________

Before JILL PRYOR, BRASHER, and ABUDU, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Daniel F. Daly, appointed counsel for Durrell Marquis Lee in these consolidated criminal appeals, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursu- ant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). 1 Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeals is correct. Because independent exam- ination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motions to withdraw are GRANTED, and Lee’s convic- tions, revocation of supervised release, and sentences are AFFIRMED.

1 Daly alternatively moves for the Court to appoint Lee counsel or to allow him to file a supplemental brief pro se. Because we grant Daly’s motion to withdraw and affirm Lee’s convictions and sentences, we deny these requests as moot.