U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, 2026

Rani Bolton v. Inland Fresh Seafood Corporation of America, Inc.

Rani Bolton v. Inland Fresh Seafood Corporation of America, Inc.
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Decided January 27, 2026
Rani Bolton v. Inland Fresh Seafood Corporation of America, Inc.

Opinion

USCA11 Case: 24-10084 Document: 55-1 Date Filed:01/27/2026 Page: 1 of 2 Jn the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit No. 24-10084 RANI BOLTON, ALISON MERCKER, JAMES ARMSTRONG, BENJAMIN LYMAN, individually and as representatives of a class of participants and beneficiaries on behalf of the Inland Fresh Seafood Corporation of America, Inc. Employee Stock Ownership Plan, MELISSA SUTER, Plaintiffs-Appellants, versus INLAND FRESH SEAFOOD CORPORATION OF AMERICA, INC., JOEL KNOX, BILL DEMMOND, CHRIS ROSENBERGER, LES SCHNEIDER, et al., Defendants-Appellees.

USCA11 Case: 24-10084 Document: 55-1 Date Filed:01/27/2026 Page: 2of2 Order of the Court 24-10084 Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia D.C. Docket No. 1:22-cv-04602-LMM Before William Pryor, Chief Judge, Jordan, Rosenbaum, Jill Pryor, Newsom, Branch, Grant, Luck, Lagoa, Brasher, Abudu, and Kidd, Circuit Judges.

BY THE COURT: A petition for rehearing having been filed and a member of this Court in active service having requested a poll on whether this ap- peal should be reheard by the Court sitting en banc, and a majority of the judges in active service on this Court having voted in favor of granting rehearing en banc, IT IS ORDERED that this appeal will be reheard en banc. The panel’s opinion is VACATED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.