United States v. Demarcus Sharon Brown
Opinion
USCA11 Case: 25-11726 Document: 17-1 Date Filed: 01/29/2026 Page: 1 of 2
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
In the
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________
No. 25-11726
Non-Argument Calendar ____________________
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee, versus
DEMARCUS SHARON BROWN, a.k.a. D,
Defendant-Appellant. ____________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama D.C. Docket No. 1:23-cr-00418-CLM-NAD-3 ____________________
Before NEWSOM, ABUDU, and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Perry Russell Steen, appointed counsel for Demarcus Brown in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further USCA11 Case: 25-11726 Document: 17-1 Date Filed: 01/29/2026 Page: 2 of 2
2 Opinion of the Court 25-11726 representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Brown’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.