Henry McKinnon, III v. Secretary, Department of Corrections

USCA11 Case: 25-12901 Document: 13-1 Date Filed: 02/06/2026 Page: 1 of 2

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 25-12901 Non-Argument Calendar ____________________ HENRY OLIVER MCKINNON, III, Petitioner-Appellant, versus SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Respondent-Appellee. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida D.C. Docket No. 3:24-cv-00783-MMH-PDB ____________________ Before ROSENBAUM, NEWSOM, and LUCK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: Henry Oliver McKinnon, III, a prisoner proceeding pro se, appeals from the district court’s August 11, 2025, order denying his USCA11 Case: 25-12901 Document: 13-1 Date Filed: 02/06/2026 Page: 2 of 2

2 Opinion of the Court 25-12901 motion to consolidate this 28 U.S.C. § 2554 action with his separate 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action.

McKinnon’s appeal is not taken from a final decision because the order did not resolve his § 2254 petition. See 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (“The courts of appeals . . . have jurisdiction . . . [over] all final de- cisions of the district courts.”); Supreme Fuels Trading FZE v. Sargeant, 689 F.3d 1244, 1246 (11th Cir. 2012) (explaining that a rul- ing that disposes of fewer than all claims is not final); NAACP of La. v. Michot, 480 F.2d 547, 548 (5th Cir. 1973) (“An order denying con- solidation is not a final appealable order.”). The order also is not immediately appealable under the collateral order doctrine be- cause it would be effectively reviewable on appeal from a final de- cision. See Acheron Capital, Ltd. v. Mukamal, 22 F.4th 979, 989 (11th Cir. 2022) (describing the doctrine’s requirements).

Accordingly, this appeal is DISMISSED, sua sponte, for lack of jurisdiction. All pending motions are DENIED as moot.