United States v. Danzavieran Durand Thurman
Opinion
USCA11 Case: 25-12186 Document: 18-1 Date Filed: 03/10/2026 Page: 1 of 2
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
In the
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________
No. 25-12186
Non-Argument Calendar ____________________
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee, versus
DANZAVIERAN DURAND THURMAN,
Defendant-Appellant. ____________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida D.C. Docket No. 2:21-cr-00103-TPB-KCD-1 ____________________
Before ROSENBAUM, GRANT, and ABUDU, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
James T. Skuthan, appointed counsel for Danzavieran Thur- man in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to USCA11 Case: 25-12186 Document: 18-1 Date Filed: 03/10/2026 Page: 2 of 2
2 Opinion of the Court 25-12186 Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the denial of Thurman’s 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) motion is AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.