United States v. Mark Donald Sotnick
Opinion
USCA11 Case: 25-12898 Document: 25-1 Date Filed: 04/09/2026 Page: 1 of 2
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
In the
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________
No. 25-12898
Non-Argument Calendar ____________________
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee, versus
MARK DONALD SOTNICK,
Defendant-Appellant. ____________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida D.C. Docket No. 6:24-cr-00031-PGB-RMN-1 ____________________
Before NEWSOM, BRANCH, and BRASHER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Ryan Truskoski, appointed counsel for Mark Sotnick in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders USCA11 Case: 25-12898 Document: 25-1 Date Filed: 04/09/2026 Page: 2 of 2
2 Opinion of the Court 25-12898 v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent review of the record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Sotnick’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.