United States v. Mark Donald Sotnick
Opinion
USCA11 Case: 25-12898 Document: 25-1 Date Filed: 04/09/2026 Page: 1 of 2
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 25-12898 Non-Argument Calendar ____________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus MARK DONALD SOTNICK, Defendant-Appellant. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida D.C. Docket No. 6:24-cr-00031-PGB-RMN-1 ____________________ Before NEWSOM, BRANCH, and BRASHER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: Ryan Truskoski, appointed counsel for Mark Sotnick in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders USCA11 Case: 25-12898 Document: 25-1 Date Filed: 04/09/2026 Page: 2 of 2
2 Opinion of the Court 25-12898 v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent review of the record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Sotnick’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.