United States v. Ricco Jerome Hicks
Opinion
USCA11 Case: 25-13278 Document: 32-1 Date Filed: 05/20/2026 Page: 1 of 2
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
In the
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________
No. 25-13278
Non-Argument Calendar ____________________
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee, versus
RICCO JEROME HICKS,
Defendant-Appellant. ____________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama D.C. Docket No. 2:24-cr-00433-MHH-GMB-2 ____________________
Before LUCK, LAGOA, and BRASHER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Perry Russell Steen, appointed counsel for Ricco Jerome Hicks in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to USCA11 Case: 25-13278 Document: 32-1 Date Filed: 05/20/2026 Page: 2 of 2
2 Opinion of the Court 25-13278 Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s mo- tion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Hicks’s conviction and sen- tence are AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.