Tony Greenidge v. Florida Department of Revenue

USCA11 Case: 26-12477 Document: 9-1 Date Filed: 09/11/2026 Page: 1 of 2

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 26-12477 Non-Argument Calendar ____________________ TONY DACOSTA GREENIDGE, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, State Government Agency, MISTY LYN FLOWERS LEACH, ANDREIA HARRIS, Child Support Enforcement Worker - Florida Department of Revenue, QUIANNA MAXWELL, Child Support Enforcement Worker - Florida Department of Revenue, KWANZAA GOODWIN, Business Analyst - Florida Department of Revenue, et al., Defendants-Appellees.

USCA11 Case: 26-12477 Document: 9-1 Date Filed: 09/11/2026 Page: 2 of 2

2 Opinion of the Court 26-12477 ____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida D.C. Docket No. 8:25-cv-00927-KKM-T_W ____________________ Before NEWSOM, BRANCH, and KIDD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: Tony Dacosta Greenidge, proceeding pro se, appeals from the district court’s order dismissing his third amended complaint.

The district court entered judgment on June 10, 2026.

Greenidge filed his notice of appeal on July 13, 2026, which was more than thirty days later. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1) (provid- ing a 30-day appeal period absent a federal party); 28 U.S.C. § 2107(a) (same); Haney v. Mizell Mem’l Hosp., 744 F.2d 1467, 1472 (11th Cir. 1984) (explaining that, under normal circumstances, a notice of appeal that is mailed to the district court is deemed filed on the date that it is received by the district court). The notice of appeal is untimely and cannot invoke our appellate jurisdiction. See Green v. Drug Enf’t Admin, 606 F.3d 1296, 1300 (11th Cir. 2010).

Accordingly, this appeal is DISMISSED, sua sponte, for lack of jurisdiction.