U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, 1894

Aktieselskabet Banan v. Hoadley

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Decided February 27, 1894 · Lacombe, Siiipmae

60 F. 447; 9 C.C.A. 61; 1894 U.S. App. LEXIS 2100

Counsel

George Betliune Adams, for appellant., George Walton Green, for appellees.

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

Fitzgerald v. Clark (Mont. 1895)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

We are not inclined to give as much weight to the various items of documentary evidence as did the learned district judge. Upon the oral testimony-of the witnesses, however, who were all examined before him, there was such conflict on the single issue of fact involved in the case that his decision thereon should not he reversed, in the absence of any new proof or of manifest error, neither of which is shown here. Decree affirmed, with interest and costs.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.