Skip to the main content
Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Statutes
Free Legal Archive /United States /Cases /U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit /

1898

95 U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit opinions from 1898.

  • The G. R. Booth Dec 14, 1898 No. 91 91 F. 164; 33 C.C.A. 430; 1898 U.S. App. LEXIS 1841
  • American Box-Mach. Co. v. Hughes Dec 7, 1898 No. 26 91 F. 147; 33 C.C.A. 425; 1898 U.S. App. LEXIS 1839
  • Buchanan v. Cleveland Linseed-Oil Co. Dec 7, 1898 No. 27 91 F. 88; 33 C.C.A. 351; 1898 U.S. App. LEXIS 1828
  • Burrill v. Crossman Dec 7, 1898 No. 1 91 F. 543; 33 C.C.A. 663; 1898 U.S. App. LEXIS 1857
  • Davies v. Miller Dec 7, 1898 No. 8 91 F. 647; 34 C.C.A. 37; 1898 U.S. App. LEXIS 1862
  • Dingelstedt v. United States Dec 7, 1898 Nos. 19, 36, 37 91 F. 112
  • Dodge v. Fulton Pulley Co. Dec 7, 1898 No. 39 92 F. 995; 35 C.C.A. 140; 1898 U.S. App. LEXIS 1877
  • Electric Car Co. of America v. Nassau Electric R. Co. Dec 7, 1898 No. 98 91 F. 142; 33 C.C.A. 420; 1898 U.S. App. LEXIS 1838
  • Fireman's Ins. v. J. H. Mohlman Co. Dec 7, 1898 No. 84 91 F. 85; 33 C.C.A. 347; 1898 U.S. App. LEXIS 1827
  • Koechl v. United States Dec 7, 1898 No. 3 91 F. 110; 33 C.C.A. 363; 1898 U.S. App. LEXIS 1831
  • Moffett, Hodgkins & Clarke Co. v. City of Rochester Dec 7, 1898 No. 5 91 F. 28; 33 C.C.A. 319; 1898 U.S. App. LEXIS 1824
  • Ross v. Raphael Tuck & Sons Co. Dec 7, 1898 No. 23 91 F. 128; 33 C.C.A. 405; 1898 U.S. App. LEXIS 1836
  • The Iroquois Dec 7, 1898 Nos. 13, 14 91 F. 173; 1898 U.S. App. LEXIS 1843
  • The Thomas Purcell, Jr. Dec 7, 1898 No. 17 92 F. 406; 34 C.C.A. 419; 1898 U.S. App. LEXIS 1875
  • United States v. Gleeson Dec 7, 1898 90 F. 778; 33 C.C.A. 272; 1898 U.S. App. LEXIS 1735
  • United States v. McCreery Dec 7, 1898 No. 20 91 F. 115; 33 C.C.A. 398; 1898 U.S. App. LEXIS 1833
  • United States v. Ross Dec 7, 1898 No. 28 91 F. 108; 33 C.C.A. 361; 1898 U.S. App. LEXIS 1830
  • United States v. Sehlbach Dec 7, 1898 90 F. 798; 33 C.C.A. 277; 1898 U.S. App. LEXIS 1737
  • Von Mumm v. Witteman Dec 7, 1898 No. 44 91 F. 126; 33 C.C.A. 404; 1898 U.S. App. LEXIS 1835
  • Peck, Stow & Wilcox Co. v. Fray Nov 15, 1898 92 F. 1021; 34 C.C.A. 688; 1898 U.S. App. LEXIS 1883
  • United States v. De Luze Nov 15, 1898 No. 18 95 F. 971; 37 C.C.A. 344; 1898 U.S. App. LEXIS 1885
  • McCafferty v. Celluloid Co. Nov 14, 1898 104 F. 305; 43 C.C.A. 540; 1898 U.S. App. LEXIS 1661
  • United States v. Herrman Nov 7, 1898 No. 30 91 F. 116; 33 C.C.A. 400; 1898 U.S. App. LEXIS 1834
  • The Sandfield Nov 3, 1898 92 F. 663; 34 C.C.A. 612; 1898 U.S. App. LEXIS 1876
  • Willcox & Gibbs Sewing-Mach. Co. v. Merrow Mach. Co. Oct 26, 1898 No. 113 93 F. 206; 35 C.C.A. 269; 1898 U.S. App. LEXIS 1667
  • Cottle v. New York, West Shore & Buffalo Railway Co. Jul 1, 1898 15-3381 27 A.D. 604
  • Barrow S. S. Co. v. Kane Jun 24, 1898 No. 98 88 F. 197; 31 C.C.A. 452; 1898 U.S. App. LEXIS 2077
  • Burroughs v. Erhardt Jun 24, 1898 No. 104 88 F. 256; 31 C.C.A. 524; 1898 U.S. App. LEXIS 2085
  • Lezinsky v. Metropolitan St. Ry. Co. Jun 24, 1898 No. 112 88 F. 437; 31 C.C.A. 573; 1898 U.S. App. LEXIS 2092
  • Price v. McCarty Jun 24, 1898 No. 105 89 F. 84; 32 C.C.A. 162; 1898 U.S. App. LEXIS 2363
  • Sands v. E. S. Greeley & Co. Jun 24, 1898 No. 120 88 F. 130; 31 C.C.A. 424; 1898 U.S. App. LEXIS 2074
  • Tuttle v. Claflin Jun 24, 1898 No. 119 88 F. 122; 31 C.C.A. 419; 1898 U.S. App. LEXIS 2073
  • Westinghouse Air-Brake Co. v. Great Northern Ry. Co. Jun 24, 1898 No. 117 88 F. 258; 31 C.C.A. 525; 1898 U.S. App. LEXIS 2086
  • Wickelman v. A. B. Dick Co. Jun 24, 1898 No. 98 88 F. 264; 31 C.C.A. 530; 1898 U.S. App. LEXIS 2087
  • Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. Doherty Jun 23, 1898 14-2873 100 Wis. 39; 75 N.W. 1079; 1898 Wisc. LEXIS 230
  • Sigua Iron Co. v. Greene Jun 13, 1898 88 F. 207; 31 C.C.A. 477; 1898 U.S. App. LEXIS 2079
  • Union Ry. Co. v. Sprague Electric Railway & Motor Co. May 17, 1898 No. 108 88 F. 82; 31 C.C.A. 391; 1898 U.S. App. LEXIS 2067
  • Insurance Co. of North America v. Canada, Sugar-Refining Co. Apr 19, 1898 No. 95 87 F. 491; 31 C.C.A. 65; 1898 U.S. App. LEXIS 1818
  • Atlas S. S. Co. v. La Campagnie Generale Transatlantique Apr 7, 1898 Nos. 21-23 86 F. 475; 1898 U.S. App. LEXIS 2305
  • Commercial Towboat Co. v. The George W. Clyde Apr 7, 1898 No. 101 86 F. 665; 1898 U.S. App. LEXIS 2326; 30 C.C.A. 292
  • Hubbard v. Manhattan Trust Co. Apr 7, 1898 No. 73 87 F. 51; 30 C.C.A. 520; 1898 U.S. App. LEXIS 1766
  • In re Leung Apr 7, 1898 No. 94 86 F. 303; 30 C.C.A. 69; 1898 U.S. App. LEXIS 2282
  • In re Li Sing Apr 7, 1898 No. 93 86 F. 896; 30 C.C.A. 451; 1898 U.S. App. LEXIS 2349
  • International Nav. Co. v. The St. Paul Apr 7, 1898 Nos. 91 and 92 86 F. 340; 1898 U.S. App. LEXIS 2283
  • Marsh v. Kings County El. Ry. Co. Apr 7, 1898 No. 86 86 F. 189; 29 C.C.A. 655; 1898 U.S. App. LEXIS 2263
  • Sill v. United States Apr 7, 1898 Nos. 77 and 78 87 F. 699; 31 C.C.A. 200; 1898 U.S. App. LEXIS 2025
  • Thomson-Houston Electric Co. v. Union Ry. Co. Apr 7, 1898 No. 110 86 F. 636; 30 C.C.A. 313; 1898 U.S. App. LEXIS 2321
  • United States v. Dean Linseed-Oil Co. Apr 7, 1898 No. 57 87 F. 453; 31 C.C.A. 51; 1898 U.S. App. LEXIS 1815
  • Forty-Second St., M. & St. N. Ave. Ry. Co. v. Hannon Mar 10, 1898 No. 100 85 F. 852; 29 C.C.A. 437; 1898 U.S. App. LEXIS 2214
  • Hoboken Ferry Co. v. Hall Mar 10, 1898 Nos. 79 and 80 86 F. 924; 1898 U.S. App. LEXIS 2356
« Prev 1 2 Next »

A public interest project of Aaron Hall, Attorney at Law © 2026

About Federal Minnesota California New York Texas Terms

Data from CourtListener / Free Law Project

↑