U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, 1903

In re Hausman

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Decided March 12, 1903

121 F. 984; 58 C.C.A. 260; 1903 U.S. App. LEXIS 4706

Counsel

Stillman F. Kneeland, for petitioner., Thaddeus D. Kenneson, for respondent.

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

In re Banzai Mfg. Co. (2d Cir. 1910)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

In affirming the order of the court below, we do not consider the question whether the bankrupt should be punished for contempt in the event of failing to comply with the order, as that question, although the one principally argued, is not here. If it should be sought to punish him for contempt, the court below will doubtless give him an opportunity to prove his inability to comply with the order.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.