U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, 1905

Municipal Telegraph & Stock Co. v. Ward

Municipal Telegraph & Stock Co. v. Ward
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Decided June 23, 1905 · Coxe, Lacombe, Townsend
138 F. 1006; 70 C.C.A. 284; 1905 U.S. App. LEXIS 3845

Counsel

John A. Delehanty, for plaintiff in error., Taylor L. Arms, for defendant in error.

Municipal Telegraph & Stock Co. v. Ward

Cases that cite this one

4 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

We do not think it necessary to add anything to the opinion of the Circuit Judge. The evidence entirely warrants the finding of facts therein set forth, and upon those facts we fully concur in the conclusion that the dealings between plaintiff and its correspondents were dealings between principals and independent of the correspondents’ dealings, each with his own customers. The judgment is affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.