U. H. Dudley & Co. v. United States
Opinion of the Court
. Since the decision of this cause at circuit, our opinion has been filed in U. S. v. Johnson (Jan. 8, 1907) 152 Fed. 164, in which we had before us pineapples similarly preserved, except that the cans contained a trifle less sugar.
We are unable to distinguish between the two causes, and therefore the decision' of the Circuit Court is reversed.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- U. H. DUDLEY & CO. v. UNITED STATES
- Cited By
- 3 cases
- Status
- Published
- Syllabus
- Customs Duties — Classieioation—Pineapples 'Preserved in Own Juice-Added Sugar. The addition .of from 2.28 to 8.82 per cent of sugar to pineapples preserved in cans in their own juice does not remove the fruit from the provision for “pineapples preserved in their own juice,” in Tariff Act July 24, 1897, c. 11, § 1. Schedule G, par. 263, 30 Stat. 171 [U. S. Comp. St. 1901. p. 1051], to the provision in the same paragraph for “fruits preserved in sugar.”