In re Plaut
In re Plaut
172 F. 1023; 96 C.C.A. 666; 1908 U.S. App. LEXIS 4940
In re Plaut
Opinion of the Court
It is unnecessary to go into any of the points of law which have been raised on this motion. We are not prepared to hold that it was an improper exercise of the discretion of the District Judge to require the plaintiff to terminate his prior state court action, either by (rial or discontinuance, before proceeding to the trial of the second and later one, which he has brought on precisely the same cause of action.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.